MARATTO

article · Physics of Fluids

Effect of external magnetic field on realistic bifurcated right coronary artery hemodynamics

Abstract

Diagnostic technology based on magnetic fields is commonly used in medicine for diagnosis and therapy. However, the exposure to strong electromagnetic fields has adverse outcomes in patients. Thus, the objective of the current study is to investigate the effect of applying external uniform magnetic fields on the blood flow in both healthy and diseased cases of right coronary artery and determine the safe values of the applied magnetic field strengths. The diseased cases include a 40% stenosed artery along with two blood disorder cases with a hematocrit level of 20% and 60%. A comprehensive three-dimensional steady non-Newtonian flow model is developed using the Casson model to investigate the effect of the magnetic field on both shear rate and hematocrits. The model is numerically simulated at different values of magnetic field strengths and its orientation. The results indicated that the magnetic field in the Y-direction has a dominant effect compared to other directions. Moreover, the maximum increase in the main branch mass flow rate fraction is about 6.2%. Another interesting finding is that the wall shear stress is slightly affected by the magnetic field strength. For the stenosed case, it is found that the high magnetic field strengths can reduce the formulation of the vortices and hence reduce the risk of thrombosis, which agrees with published works. Additionally, the obtained results confirm that using a magnetic field up to 11.7 T, which is used in magnetic resonance imaging devices, is safe, and has a slight effect on blood flow parameters such as the wall shear stress.

Research topics

  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
  • Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1063/5.0152322

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.