article · Research Journal of Finance and Accounting
Capital adequacy implies the conventional assessment of the minimal level of capital, according to certain parameters, which reflect the dimension of banking activity and of related risks, capable to provide a correlation between the supposed obtained benefits and potential loss caused by a certain risk level. Since Capital adequacy ratio (CAR) is the ratio that is set by the regulatory authority in the banking sector, and this ratio can be used to test the health of the banking system. Thus, this study examines the effect of bank specific (Bank Size ,Deposit to Asset Ratio, Loan to Asset Ratio, Loan to Deposit Ratio, Return on Asset, Return on Equity ,Loan Loss Provision) and macroeconomic determinants (Gross Domestic Product and Inflation) on capital adequacy ratio of Ethiopian Private Commercial Banks. In order to investigate these issues a quantitative method research approach is utilized, by using documentary analysis. More specifically, the study uses five years (2016 – 2020) data for fourteen private commercial banks in Ethiopia. The study used multiple linear regression models to determine the relative importance of each independent variable using OLS to estimate the relationship between CAR its determinants by STATA 13 econometric software. The findings show that bank size, return on equity ,loan to asset ratio affect capital adequacy ratio negatively whereas return on asset ,loan loss provision affect capital adequacy ratio positively .Hence , it is recommended that to be sure that to be sure that bank have adequate adequacy reserve ,commercial bank and national bank of Ethiopia should give attention to the risk associated with bank size ,caring bank loan and deposit initiating to increase their return on their return on their asset and to manage their equity return. Keywords: Capital adequacy ratio, Ethiopian Private Commercial Banks, Panel data analysis DOI: 10.7176/RJFA/11-21-01 Publication date: November 30 th 2020
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.7176/rjfa/11-21-01
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.