MARATTO

article · Assiut Scientific Nursing Journal

Effect of Applying SCAMPER Technique for Creative Thinking on Senior Nursing Students’ Clinical Judgment Skills

20241 citationOpen accessBenha University

Abstract

Background: Applying strategies to develop nursing students’ creative thinking to manage clinically challenging situations is the prime role of nursing education to support their decision-making and clinical judgment skills. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of applying SCAMPER technique for creative thinking on senior nursing students’ clinical judgment skills. Setting: The study was conducted at Tanta University- Faculty of Nursing. Subjects: (300) senior nursing students. Tools: Three tools were used SCAMPER Technique and Clinical Judgment Knowledge Questionnaire, SCAMPER Technique Checklist and Lasater’s Clinical Judgment Rubric. Results: 73.3% of the experimental senior nursing students had a low knowledge level regarding SCAMPER per-intervention, but 73.3% had high level post-intervention. Also 96.0% had unsatisfactory level of practicing creative thinking at pre-intervention, and post-intervention 92.7% had satisfactory level. Pre-intervention 85.3% of the experimental senior nursing students had a low clinical judgment knowledge level and post-intervention 56.0% had high level. Also 96.1% of the experimental senior nursing students’ fall in the beginning stage of practicing clinical judgment pre-intervention, but post–intervention 42.8% fall in accomplished stage. Conclusion: Applying SCAMPER technique enhanced senior nursing students’ clinical judgment. Recommendations: Nursing faculties need to integrate knowledgebase about creative thinking and clinical judgment in the undergraduate curricula to enhance students’ creativity and improve autonomous nursing interventions.

Research topics

  • Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Education, Leadership, and Health Research

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/asnj.2024.266289.1768

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.