article · African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
This study compares the benefits of using digestate and compost in Burkina Faso. A mathematical programming model was used to simulate the advantages under three scenarios. The baseline scenario reflected the typical situation of farmers, followed by the introduction of digestate and compost as soil amendments. The model applied these to improve poor soils and recover fallow land. As a result, the production of maize, cotton, rice, millet and sorghum increased, while groundnut cultivation and fallow land decreased. Gains were most notable with digestate. During poor cropping seasons, income rose by 238% with digestate and by 132% with compost. During good seasons, income increased by 164% and 98%, respectively. The use of digestate and compost helped reduce poverty and promote food security, although credit and labour constraints remain important considerations.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.53936/afjare.2026.21(1).1
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.