MARATTO

article · Scientific Reports

Ecological capacity in water-stressed Somalia under globalization, institutional change and human capital development

2026Open accessSIMAD University

In plain language

An empirical assessment evaluates the drivers of ecological sustainability in Somalia using annual records from 1990 to 2020. The evaluation relies on the Load Capacity Factor, which reflects the balance between biocapacity and ecological demand, alongside econometric techniques including ARDL bounds testing, FMOLS, DOLS, and the Toda-Yamamoto causality framework. The analysis demonstrates that globalisation weakens ecological capacity in both the short and long run, while water stress produces significant adverse long-run impacts. In contrast, institutional quality, measured through government stability, and human capital development, measured via secondary school-age populations, show positive long-term associations with the Load Capacity Factor. Causal testing confirms that globalisation, water stress, institutions, and education predict shifts in ecological capacity, with feedback directed mainly towards globalisation. Consequently, environmental stability depends heavily on strengthening governance, improving water management, and investing in human capital.

Key takeaways

  • Globalisation reduces Somalia's Load Capacity Factor across both the short and long run.
  • Water stress exerts a significant negative effect on ecological capacity over the long term.
  • Institutional quality and human capital development show positive, statistically significant long-run relationships with ecological capacity.
  • Globalisation, water stress, institutional stability, and education predict shifts in ecological performance, with feedback moving from ecological capacity back to globalisation.

Why it matters

Balancing economic development with natural resource preservation is a crucial challenge in fragile environments. This research shows that opening up to international markets and dealing with water scarcity can degrade ecological reserves unless matched by stable governance and educational investment. The insights help planners design integrated environmental and development strategies.

Commercialisation angle

The abstract outlines macroeconomic and environmental econometric analysis rather than a product or operational technology, providing no basis for direct commercialisation pathways. The findings primarily serve policymakers, international development organisations, and public water resource managers seeking evidence to guide regulatory frameworks, institutional stability initiatives, and environmental governance.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

This study empirically examines the determinants of ecological sustainability in Somalia by analysing the relationships among globalization, water stress, institutional quality, and human capital using annual data from 1990 to 2020. The Load Capacity Factor (LCF), which captures the balance between biocapacity and ecological demand, is employed as the principal measure of ecological sustainability. ARDL bounds testing is used to assess cointegration, while Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS) and Dynamic Ordinary Least Squares (DOLS) validate the long-run estimates, and the Toda–Yamamoto procedure examines predictive causality. The results indicate that globalization reduces Somalia’s LCF in both the short and long run, whereas water stress has a significant adverse effect in the long run. Conversely, institutional quality, proxied by the ICRG Government Stability indicator, and human capital, represented by the population of official secondary-school age for both sexes, have positive and statistically significant long-run associations with the LCF. The causality results further show that globalization, water stress, institutional quality, and human capital predict changes in the LCF, while feedback from the LCF is primarily observed toward globalization. Overall, Somalia’s ecological sustainability is constrained by water stress, institutional fragility, and environmentally unsustainable forms of global integration. The findings support a sequenced policy agenda that reconciles globalization with environmental stewardship, strengthens water-resource governance, promotes institutional development, and expands investment in human-capital formation.

Research topics

  • Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Water Resources and Sustainability

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-69829-0

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.