MARATTO

review · Desalination and Water Treatment

Eco-friendly adsorbents for industrial dye removal: A comprehensive review of low-cost alternatives

202516 citationsOpen accessDebre Markos University

In plain language

Industrial activities across textiles, cosmetics, plastics, and leather discharge large volumes of coloured wastewater containing toxic, carcinogenic, and mutagenic dyes. While adsorption is an effective method for removing these pollutants, conventional activated carbon remains expensive. This review synthesises current evidence on low-cost alternative adsorbents derived from natural materials, industrial by-products, and synthetic wastes. Materials such as chitosan, clay, and agricultural biomass show notable potential due to their natural abundance, renewability, and high adsorption capacity. The analysis evaluates operational factors, adsorption mechanisms, and comparative performance against commercial activated carbon. Overall, evidence indicates that selected alternative adsorbents can deliver rapid kinetics and strong removal efficiencies under optimised operating conditions.

Key takeaways

  • Industrial dyes present severe toxic, mutagenic, and carcinogenic risks in wastewater discharged by sectors including textiles, leather, and plastics.
  • Low-cost alternative adsorbents sourced from natural resources, industrial by-products, and synthetic wastes offer viable substitutes for costly activated carbon.
  • Chitosan, clay-based adsorbents, and agricultural biomass demonstrate high adsorption efficacy, rapid kinetics, and strong capacities under optimised conditions.

Why it matters

Wastewater carrying synthetic dyes threatens aquatic ecosystems and public health. Conventional purification technologies often rely on expensive materials that limit widespread adoption. Finding accessible, sustainable alternatives derived from waste products and natural resources makes wastewater management more affordable, helping polluting industries clean their effluent before it enters natural waterways.

Commercialisation angle

The work highlights low-cost adsorption solutions for industrial wastewater treatment facilities in sectors such as textiles, printing, and cosmetics. Because the review synthesises existing laboratory and literature findings rather than reporting scaled trials, the technology remains at an early to intermediate stage of commercial readiness, requiring process optimisation and engineering validation before commercial deployment.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

This review examines the removal of industrial dyes using cost-effective natural adsorbents, emphasizing their role as an alternative to expensive activated carbon. Dyes are extensively used in industries such as textiles, rubber, plastics, printing, leather, and cosmetics, leading to the discharge of significant volumes of colored wastewater. These dyes pose serious environmental and health risks due to their carcinogenic, mutagenic, and toxic properties. Various treatment methods are available for dye removal, with adsorption being one of the most effective approaches. The increasing need for efficient and affordable wastewater treatment solutions has driven interest in low-cost alternative adsorbents (LCAs). This review provides a comprehensive overview of LCAs, including naturally occurring materials, industrial byproducts, and synthetic wastes, highlighting their potential for dye removal. The mechanisms and effectiveness of these adsorbents are discussed in detail, along with key factors influencing their adsorption performance. A thorough literature survey reveals that certain LCAs not only offer widespread availability but also exhibit rapid adsorption kinetics and significant adsorption capacities. The advantages and limitations of different adsorbents, optimal conditions for specific adsorbate-adsorbent interactions, and comparative adsorption capacities of various LCAs and commercial activated carbon are analyzed based on existing studies. Finally, conclusions are drawn from the literature analysis, summarizing key findings and understandings of the potential of life cycle assessments (LCAs) for sustainable wastewater treatment. With an emphasis on particularly beneficial materials like chitosan, agricultural biomass, and clay-based adsorbents due to their availability, renewability, and remarkable adsorption efficacy, this review provides forward-looking perspectives and recommendations regarding the development of LCAs for cost-effective water treatment. • The review explores the removal of industrial dyes from wastewater using cost-effective natural adsorbents as sustainable alternatives to activated carbon. • Industrial dyes pose severe environmental and health risks due to their carcinogenic, mutagenic, and toxic nature. Identifying efficient and affordable treatment methods is crucial for sustainable wastewater management. • Low-cost alternative adsorbents (LCAs) derived from natural materials, industrial byproducts, and synthetic wastes exhibit significant adsorption capacities, such as wide availability, eco-friendly, cost-effectiveness, and high adsorption efficiency under optimized conditions. • The review presents a detailed evaluation of adsorption mechanisms, key influencing factors, and comparative performance analysis of various adsorbents.

Research topics

  • Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions
  • Extraction and Separation Processes

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dwt.2025.101362

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.