MARATTO

article · Heliyon

Does political conflict tilt finance-renewable energy dynamics in Africa? Accounting for the multi-dimensional approach to financial development and threshold effect of political conflict

202334 citationsOpen access

In plain language

An examination of 46 African nations from 2010 to 2020 evaluates how financial development influences renewable energy consumption, accounting for the threshold effects of political conflict. The findings reveal that financial development directly accelerates renewable energy use, while political conflict restricts it. Furthermore, the capacity of financial mechanisms to spur renewable energy is contingent on crossing specific thresholds regarding access to financial facilities and levels of political stability. An analysis of these thresholds indicates that 11 countries in the sample, including Botswana, Mauritius, Cape Verde, Namibia, and Ghana, sit above the political conflict threshold. Consequently, accelerating clean energy transitions requires governments to establish stable environments and supportive safety nets that enable diverse financing models for renewable energy ventures.

Key takeaways

  • Financial development stimulates renewable energy consumption across African nations, while political conflict impedes it.
  • The positive effect of financial development on renewable energy depends on specific thresholds of financial access and political stability.
  • Eleven studied countries, including Botswana, Ghana, Mauritius, and Namibia, register above the identified political conflict threshold.
  • Promoting alternative renewable energy initiatives requires policy safety nets that facilitate diverse financing mechanisms.

Why it matters

Transitioning to sustainable energy requires considerable investment, but political instability can derail the impact of capital. By identifying the stability thresholds required for financial development to effectively drive renewable energy adoption, this analysis helps policymakers and international finance institutions understand where clean energy investments are viable and where political risk must first be addressed.

Commercialisation angle

The abstract does not indicate an application pathway.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

In order to shed empirical light on the impact of the multi-dimensional decomposition of financial development indicators on renewable energy usage, this study investigates the threshold effect of political conflict on finance-energy dynamics in Africa. The research output relies on a panel of 46 African nations from 2010 to 2020, using IV-GMM estimators that are robust to cross-sectional dependence and allow for heterogeneous slope coefficients. The results of direct, indirect, and threshold equations show that i.) Financial development indicators spur renewable energy consumption, while political conflict drags it. ii.) There is a threshold at which financial development could spur renewable energy in some regions of Africa, and the tendency of financial development to maintain such capacity is conditioned on the accessibility of financial facilities and political conflict/stability within a specific range of threshold values. iii.) the threshold level assessment shows that 11 countries in the panel, including Botswana, Mauritius, Cape Verde, Namibia, Seychelles, Zambia, Sao Tome and Principe, Gabon, Ghana and Benin Rep., are above the threshold level of political conflict in Africa. From a policy angle, driving up renewable energy consumption in Africa requires the government to provide enabling safety net environment for the diversification of finance options targeting innovative shifts away from traditional energy sources to the expansion of alternative renewable energy ventures.

Research topics

  • Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14155

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.