MARATTO

article · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Does biochar amendment of e-waste contaminated soil improve earthworm growth and reproduction?

Abstract

Inadequate management of e-waste at informal recycling sites contaminates soil. Biochar offers agricultural and environmental benefits, but its effects on soil fauna remain poorly understood. We evaluated biochar's effects on the growth and reproduction of the earthworm, Alma nilotica (Grube, 1855), to determine an application level that mitigates harmful effects of e-waste contaminants without harming soil organisms. Biochar was prepared from dried maize cobs using a closed drum technique at 500 to 530°C. Effects on earthworm growth and reproduction were assessed using Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) test guidelines and test methods. Results indicated that growth and reproduction were inhibited in a dose-dependent manner, by up to 50 ± 6.4% and 68.2 ± 6.6%, respectively, at a 5% application rate without e-waste contaminants. Earthworm length was more sensitive to the e-waste contaminants than weight, showing disproportionate growth. A dose-dependent growth and reproduction inhibition was also observed in biochar-amended e-waste contaminated soil, giving growth and median reproduction inhibitory concentration (95% confidence interval) of 3.75% (3.25-4.30%) and 2.1% (1.9-2.3%) biochar, respectively. Biochar amendment of e-waste soil at 1% significantly improved earthworm growth (2.2 times longer) and reproduction (5 times more offspring) compared to the unamended soil, unlike at 5% biochar amendment, where growth and reproduction were not different from the unamended soil. These findings underscore the importance of considering optimal biochar dosage in soil amendments to enhance earthworm growth and reproduction.

Research topics

  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1093/etojnl/vgaf263

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.