MARATTO

article · Journal of Financial Crime

Do cybersecurity threats and risks have an impact on the adoption of digital banking? A systematic literature review

202434 citationsOpen accessTshwane University of Technology

In plain language

A systematic literature review synthesising empirical evidence across 58 qualifying studies highlights key cybersecurity threats impeding digital banking adoption. The evaluation identifies identity theft, malware attacks, phishing, and vishing as the primary risks discouraging users from engaging with digital financial services. Emerging from an environment where the banking sector faces numerous security breaches while navigating relatively unfamiliar digital ground, the review consolidates existing research to support the development of sustainable defence strategies. By synthesising quantitative and empirical findings from literature, the work provides a unified view of the specific attack vectors that undermine consumer trust and slow down the transition toward digital banking channels.

Key takeaways

  • A synthesis of 58 empirical studies confirms that cybersecurity threats significantly impede the adoption of digital banking.
  • Identity theft, malware attacks, phishing, and vishing are consistently identified as the primary threats reducing digital banking uptake.
  • The analysis synthesises evidence to support the development of sustainable cybersecurity strategies in sectors confronting ongoing breaches.

Why it matters

Digital banking relies entirely on user trust, which collapses if customers fear losing their money or personal data. By pin-pointing the precise threats that discourage people from using online banking, financial institutions can target their protective measures directly at the dangers, such as phishing and malware, that most severely undermine public confidence.

Commercialisation angle

The findings can inform banking institutions and software developers seeking to design targeted safeguards against phishing, vishing, malware, and identity theft. Because the work is a systematic literature review rather than a tested product, it represents early-stage insight that requires translation by industry practitioners into specific fraud-detection tools, risk mitigation strategies, and user protection programmes.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of the study is to identify cybersecurity threats that hinder the adoption of digital banking and provide sustainable strategies to combat cybersecurity risks in the banking industry. Design/methodology/approach Systematic literature review guidelines were used to conduct a quantitative synthesis of empirical evidence regarding the impact of cybersecurity threats and risks on the adoption of digital banking. Findings A total of 84 studies were initially examined, and after applying the selection and eligibility criteria for this systematic review, 58 studies were included. These selected articles consistently identified identity theft, malware attacks, phishing and vishing as significant cybersecurity threats that hinder the adoption of digital banking. Originality/value With the country’s banking sector being new in this area, this study contributes to the scant literature on cyber security, which is mostly in need due to the myriad breaches that the industry has already suffered thus far.

Research topics

  • Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Information and Cyber Security

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1108/jfc-10-2023-0263

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.