article · Scientific Reports
In this study, direct sulfonation of un-carbonized raw coal using p-xylene-2-sulfonic acid hydrate was successfully achieved—a rarely reported modification route compared with the conventional sulfonation of activated carbon after carbonization. This one-step molecular-level substitution presents a key novelty, enabling transformation of the native turbostratic microstructure without prior thermal treatment. XRD analysis confirmed substantial disruption of semi-crystalline carbon domains, with strong suppression of the characteristic (10) band at 40–50° (2θ), indicating conversion to a highly amorphous and defect-rich surface. The resulting sulfonated coal (SF.CA) demonstrated markedly enhanced adsorption performance toward Bisphenol A and 4-chlorophenol, reaching Q sat values of 245.78 mg/g and 242.44 mg/g, respectively, positioning the material among the most effective carbonaceous sorbents for phenolic pollutants. Equilibrium modeling identified the single-site monolayer model as the best fit (R 2 = 0.999; χ 2 as low as 0.03). Statistical-physics analysis provided deeper mechanistic insight, revealing multi-molecular stacking at each adsorption site, with steric coefficients n = 3.21–3.97 and active-site densities Nₘ decreasing from 76.75 to 47.90 mg/g with increasing temperature. This decline directly reflects temperature-sensitive anchoring behavior. The negative energetic parameter (ΔE down to −15.06 kJ/mol) across all temperatures confirms a spontaneous, low-energy, exothermic adsorption mechanism. The combined steric and energetic parameters support a vertical multi-molecule assembly stabilized through hydrogen bonding and π–π interactions at the SF.CA interface. Overall, the findings show that direct sulfonation is both synthetically simpler and capable of producing a highly efficient adsorbent whose behaviour is validated quantitatively at the molecular scale.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-63296-3
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.