MARATTO

article · Buildings

Digital Twins for Thermal Comfort and Energy Efficiency in Buildings: A Systematic Review

2026Open accessAin Shams University

Abstract

This systematic review builds upon 51 published empirical studies out of 354 studies that were published between 2020 and 2025 to assess the effectiveness of building-scale digital twins (DTs) in providing thermal comfort and energy efficiency, and improving the indoor environment and system reliability. The results show that there is a rapidly developing field focused on five thematic clusters: system architecture, artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML)-driven control, human-centric engagement, predictive maintenance, and blockchain-enabled cybersecurity. Existing DT frameworks not only achieve real-time building information modeling (BIM)–Internet of Things (IoT) integration with prediction errors under 10%, but reinforcement learning controllers are also able to achieve 25–40% heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) energy savings, and human-centric interfaces increase thermal satisfaction from 0.64 up to 1.2 Likert points. Predictive maintenance models have diagnostic accuracies of 91–97%, and new blockchain applications enhance data integrity, but largely at the prototype level. The cross-cluster convergence signifies the transition towards adaptive, socio-technical systems with an equilibrium of efficiency, comfort, reliability, and trust. The major weaknesses identified in this paper were a lack of longitudinal validation, climatic bias and ethical governance. A framework of a modular six-layer architecture is proposed after the review of 51 studies, which facilitates scalable, interoperable, and ethically robust DT deployments.

Research topics

  • Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Digital Transformation in Industry
  • BIM and Construction Integration

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/buildings16091715

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.