article · Journal of economics, business and commerce.
Digital health innovations accelerated globally in the post-COVID era, presenting opportunities and challenges for low- and middle-income countries like Nigeria. Nigeria’s recent health reforms and digital infrastructure policies signal intent to leapfrog persistent healthcare gaps. Using a socio-technical “rail–bed–app” lens (digital infrastructure → platforms → application layer) and an equity framework, we reviewed literature (2014–2025) on telemedicine, artificial intelligence (AI), and health-fintech in Nigeria versus high-income comparators (USA’s Kaiser Permanente, UK’s NHS, Germany, and Singapore). Nigeria’s telemedicine uptake remains nascent, constrained by infrastructure and regulatory gaps, whereas HICs scaled virtual care broadly during COVID-19. Nigeria’s emerging AI health startups show promise but face regulatory and workforce challenges; HICs benefit from structured AI oversight (EU AI Act 2024) and extensive clinical integration. In health-fintech, Nigeria’s mobile micro-insurance schemes aim to expand coverage but struggle with trust and low enrollment, whereas HICs leverage mature open-banking ecosystems (PSD2 in the EU) to drive innovative payment models. Nigeria’s policy momentum is narrowing the intent–impact gap in digital health, yet enforceable standards, inclusive financing mechanisms, and strengthened governance are needed to ensure sustainable and equitable health outcomes.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.69739/jebc.v2i1.597
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.