MARATTO

review · Cogent Education

Digital literacy gaps in promoting 21 <sup>st</sup> century skills among students in higher education institutions in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review

202543 citationsOpen accessThe University of Dodoma

In plain language

A systematic review examined digital literacy gaps that affect how higher education institutions in sub-Saharan Africa foster twenty-first century skills. By analysing 14 empirical studies published between 2016 and 2023, the research identified key barriers preventing graduates from acquiring necessary digital workplace capabilities. Inadequate digital infrastructure and unprepared lecturers severely restrict skill development across institutions. Additionally, the effective adoption of teaching technologies is hindered by outdated or nonexistent information and communication technology policies. Addressing these shortcomings requires comprehensive curriculum reforms that prioritise digital solutions, coupled with dedicated professional development for educators. Enhancing digital literacy across these universities is highlighted as vital for preparing students for the job market and driving broader socio-economic growth across the region.

Key takeaways

  • University students in sub-Saharan Africa face digital skill deficits driven by inadequate infrastructure and unprepared teaching staff.
  • The absence or obsolescence of institutional technology policies severely impedes the adoption of modern teaching tools.
  • Curricula require reform to prioritise digital solutions and foster relevant workforce competencies.
  • Academic staff require focused professional development to effectively integrate technology into higher education classrooms.

Why it matters

Graduates need digital capabilities to compete in modern employment markets. Pinpointing institutional deficits, such as inadequate campus infrastructure, weak institutional policies, and insufficient lecturer training, provides guidance for education leaders and policymakers. Rectifying these systemic gaps is critical for enabling universities to better support sustainable socio-economic development across sub-Saharan Africa.

Commercialisation angle

The findings suggest potential application areas for providers of educator training programmes, digital learning platforms, and curriculum development services targeting higher education institutions in the region. However, as the evidence comes from a systematic literature review, this research is at an early conceptual stage and does not present, test, or validate any specific commercial tool or product.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

This study examined digital literacy gaps impacting the promotion of the 21st century skills among students in higher education institutions in sub-Saharan Africa. As many institutions undergo technological transformations, understanding these gaps is crucial for equipping graduates with the required digital workforce skills. The review synthesized findings from 14 empirical studies published between 2016 and 2023 using content analysis through Atlas.ti software to identify patterns. Key findings revealed that 21st century skills are insufficiently developed due to inadequate digital infrastructure and unprepared lecturers. Additionally, outdated or nonexistent ICT policies hinder the effective adoption of technology in teaching. The study calls for reforms in curricula to prioritize digital solutions and enhance professional development for educators. Improved digital literacy is vital for preparing students for the job market and fostering broader socio-economic development in sub-Saharan Africa. Future research should investigate long-term trends and evaluate the effectiveness of digital literacy initiatives across varied educational contexts.

Research topics

  • 21st Century Education and Governance
  • Global Education Systems and Policies
  • Higher Education and Teaching Methods

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1080/2331186x.2025.2452085

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.