article · International Review of Management and Marketing
This study examines the effect of digital audit evidence on audit independence among Big Four audit firms in Nigeria, with particular emphasis on analytical, forensic, electronic, and artificial intelligence–driven audit evidence. A survey research design was adopted. Data were collected from 365 employees of Big Four audit firms using a structured questionnaire. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multiple regression analysis. The results reveal that digital audit evidence had significant positive effect on audit independence. Specifically, analytical procedural audit evidence, forensic audit evidence, and digital audit evidence gathering significantly enhance audit independence, while electronic documented audit evidence and AI-based confirmation evidence show insignificant effects. The study is limited to Big Four audit firms in Nigeria and relies on perceptual data. Future research may adopt longitudinal or experimental designs. Audit firms should prioritize investment in analytical and forensic digital tools and enhance auditor training in digital competencies to strengthen audit independence. The study contributes to the audit digitalization literature by disaggregating digital audit evidence into distinct components and providing evidence from an emerging economy.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.32479/irmm.24039
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.