MARATTO

article · Suez Canal University Medical Journal

Diagnostic Utility of Chest CT versus Radiography in COVID-19

2024Open accessSuez Canal University

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) is considered an acute infectious disease mainly involving the respiratory system. The diagnosis depends on a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. However, these methods are time-consuming do not allow assessing the disease severity and may give false negative results. Aim: The present study was conducted to identify the role of CT chest findings and chest radiography in the diagnosis, severity, and prognosis of the disease. Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional study included 105 patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 infection from Suez Canal University Hospital, Ismailia City, Egypt. All patients were subjected to history taking, chest X-ray, and CT. Results: A review of the chest X-ray of the study subjects revealed that 21.9% of the study patients had positive chest X-ray findings and 78.1% had negative findings. Those chest x-ray findings were unilateral in 13.0% and bilateral in 87.0% of the 23 positive patients. About 18.1% of the study patients had subtle CT findings, 15.2% had mild-moderate findings, 18.1% had extensive findings, 8.6% had very severe findings, and 40.0% had negative findings. This is compared to only 21.9% positive cases by the chest X-ray. Compared to the 63 subjects with positive findings in the CT scan (60 %), the chest X-ray imaging interpretation findings were much less (only 23 subjects comprising 21.9 % of all subjects). Conclusion: CT is the modality of choice while X-Ray has a very limited role in COVID Imaging. Further larger longitudinal studies are needed to confirm the results of our study.

Research topics

  • COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21608/scumj.2024.343207

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.