MARATTO

article

Diagnostic performance of D-dimer in pulmonary embolism in patients with COVID19

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> COVID pneumonia was associated with a high risk of thromboembolic complications particularly pulmonary embolism (PE). The D-dimers level, a marker of inflammation, is often high in COVID 19. What would be, then, its place in the diagnostic prediction of PE in COVID 19? <b>Aim:</b> To study the diagnostic performance of D-dimer to exclude PE in COVID19. <b>Methods:</b> We included 470 patients hospitalized in the pulmonary department of Charles Nicolle hospital in Tunisia, from September 2020 to September 2021, for COVID pneumonia. We defined two groups: G1 (with PE (n=20) and G2 (without PE (n=450)) ROC curve was generated to measure the diagnostic performance and the cutoff level of D-dimer in PE. <b>Results:</b> Our 470 patients had a mean age of 60 years old, with a male predominance at 54%. PE was statically associated with the chest pain (40% vs 3%, p&lt;0.001), hypocapnia (32 mmHg vs 39 mmHg, p=0.001), also with a higher troponin level (139 ng/l vs 18 ng/l, p&lt;0.001) and d-dimer level (15,347 ng/ml vs 4.104 ng/ml, p= 0.002). ROC curve of the D-Dimers level according to the PE occurrence showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.842 ([0.753-0.932] 95% CI, p&lt;0.0001). The best D-dimer cutoff value on the ROC curve for PE diagnosis was 1690 ng/ml with a sensitivity of 88%. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our results agree with the literature in terms of higher D-dimer concentration and higher D-dimer threshold to exclude PE. Thus, the use of a higher D-dimer cut-off than the conventional one could have a better diagnostic performance of PE in COVID.

Research topics

  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1183/13993003.congress-2023.pa302

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.