MARATTO

article · African Journal of Empirical Research

Development planning practices in Zambia: Implications for national development

2026Open accessUniversity of Zambia

Abstract

Every nation aspires to attain the status of a developed country, and the effectiveness of development planning is widely regarded as a principal determinant of differential development outcomes across nations. Since independence in 1964, Zambia has pursued national development through successive development plans; yet, after more than six decades, the country remains classified as a developing nation. This study critically examines the current state of development planning practices in Zambia and their implications for national development. Grounded in a quantitative survey methodology, data were collected from 100 professional planners drawn from a population of 125 attendees at the 9th Conference of Planners convened by the Zambia Institute of Planners in Livingstone. Questionnaires were administered to all 125 conference attendees. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, comprising frequency distributions and percentage tabulations, processed through the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). Findings reveal a bifurcated reality: on the positive side, Zambia exhibits a mature development planning culture characterised by qualified planners, multi-level institutional participation, and broad alignment of national development plans with global development frameworks, including the Sustainable Development Goals. On the deficit side, the study uncovers persistent and systemic weaknesses: an inadequate and poorly understood planning process, limited access to reliable information for plan content, insufficient mastery of planning tools and techniques, weak resource support, deficient monitoring and evaluation frameworks, and fragile governance of the development planning function. These structural deficits, cumulatively, help explain why Zambia has not translated planning effort into substantive development progress. The study advances targeted policy recommendations covering governance reform, capacity building, information infrastructure, and resource allocation.

Research topics

  • Local Economic Development and Planning
  • Urban and Rural Development Challenges
  • Urban Planning and Governance

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.51867/ajernet.7.1.129

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.