MARATTO

article · International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Development of Novel Quinoline-Based Sulfonamides as Selective Cancer-Associated Carbonic Anhydrase Isoform IX Inhibitors

202131 citationsOpen accessKafr el-Sheikh University

Abstract

A new series of quinoline-based benzenesulfonamides (<b>QBS</b>) were developed as potential carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs). The target <b>QBS</b> CAIs is based on the 4-anilinoquinoline scaffold where the primary sulphonamide functionality was grafted at C4 of the anilino moiety as a zinc anchoring group (<b>QBS</b>&nbsp;<b>13a</b>-<b>c</b>); thereafter, the sulphonamide group was switched to <i>ortho</i>- and <i>meta</i>-positions to afford regioisomers <b>9a</b>-<b>d</b> and <b>11a</b>-<b>g</b>. Moreover, a linker elongation approach was adopted where the amino linker was replaced by a hydrazide one to afford <b>QBS</b>&nbsp;<b>16</b>. All the described <b>QBS</b> have been synthesized and investigated for their CA inhibitory action against <i>h</i>CA I, II, IX and XII. In general, <i>para</i>-sulphonamide derivatives <b>13a</b>-<b>c</b> displayed the best inhibitory activity against both cancer-related isoforms <i>h</i>CA IX (<i>K</i><sub>I</sub>s = 25.8, 5.5 and 18.6 nM, respectively) and <i>h</i>CA XII (<i>K</i><sub>I</sub>s = 9.8, 13.2 and 8.7 nM, respectively), beside the excellent <i>h</i>CA IX inhibitory activity exerted by <i>meta</i>-sulphonamide derivative <b>11c</b> (<i>K</i><sub>I</sub> = 8.4 nM). The most promising <b>QBS</b> were further evaluated for their anticancer and pro-apoptotic activities on two cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7). In addition, molecular docking simulation studies were applied to justify the acquired CA inhibitory action of the target QBS.

Research topics

  • Enzyme function and inhibition
  • Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions
  • Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.3390/ijms222011119

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.