MARATTO

preprint

Development of a hardened industrial strain of S. cerevisiae for bioethanol production from sugarcane bagasse hydrolysates

20241 citationOpen accessStellenbosch University

Abstract

<title>Abstract</title> Sugarcane bagasse is a priority source of industrially available lignocellulose for producing residue-based fuels using microbes such as <italic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</italic>. This process requires pre-treatment (such as dilute acid or steam explosion) of the lignocellulosic material, which often releases the monomeric sugars (glucose and xylose) and selected microbial inhibitors. A key bottleneck, however, remains the limited xylose ability and toxicity of the released microbial inhibitors that negatively affect the fermentation ability of the yeast. Hence, this study engineered the industrial, xylose-utilizing <italic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</italic> CelluX<sup>TM</sup>4 strain for improved resistance to pre-treatment-derived microbial inhibitors by overexpressing various genes associated with inhibitor resistance phenotypes. Combinations of six homologous genes were overexpressed through 3 rounds of genomic integrations, resulting in the C4TP1 and C4TP3 groups of transformants. These were screened in 50% w/w sugarcane hydrolysate fermentations under industrially relevant conditions for bioethanol production. Key findings show that the highest bioethanol titers were from C4TP1 and C4TP3 transformants, ranging from 1.8–35.2 g/L, which far outperformed the 2.1–3.2 g/L achieved by the CelluX<sup>TM</sup>4 industrial strain. Moreover, the TFA3.3 and TFA1.4 transformants achieved 39.4 and 40.1 g/L bioethanol titers, respectively. Thus, the overexpressed genes contributed to the improved tolerance to inhibitors, resulting in a step-change improvement in fermentation performance.

Research topics

  • Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Enzyme Production and Characterization

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5108034/v1

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.