MARATTO

article · Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia

Development and validation of a labour epidural analgesia documentation instrument for South African hospitals

Abstract

Background: Labour epidural analgesia is the gold standard for intrapartum pain relief, yet documentation practices remain inconsistent, particularly in resource-constrained settings. Inadequate documentation creates patient-safety risk and limits audit and governance. No formally validated labour epidural documentation instrument has been described in the published literature. Aim: This study aimed to develop and content-validate a standardised labour epidural analgesia documentation instrument for the South African health sector. Setting: Study was conducted in the South African health sector. Methods: A two-phase instrument development and content validation study were conducted. In the development phase, a concept instrument was generated from a literature review and refined through expert consensus. In the quantification phase, national anaesthesiology experts independently rated items for relevance and importance using a four-point Likert scale. Item-level and scale-level content validity indices and inter-rater agreement values were calculated using predefined thresholds. Results: The initial 68-item concept instrument was refined to 56 items. Quantitative content validation resulted in a final instrument comprising four domains: pre-procedural assessment, intra-procedural documentation, post-procedural follow-up and chart layout. Most retained items demonstrated high item-level content validity (I-CVI ≥ 0.78), with inter-rater agreement values from 0.80 to 1.00. The layout domain had a borderline scale-level content validity index (S-CVI = 0.79), with all retained items meeting item-level validity criteria. Conclusion: This study presents a content-validated labour epidural analgesia documentation instrument, defining a consensus-based minimum dataset for clinical practice. Contribution: The findings of this research provide a foundation for patient-safety initiatives, audit, training and future electronic anaesthesia record development.

Research topics

  • Health Education and Validation
  • Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Patient Safety and Medication Errors

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.4102/sajaa.v32i1.1562

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.