MARATTO

article · Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering

Development and Characterization of Polyethylene Naphthalate (PEN)/Tungsten Oxide (WO3) Composites for Gamma Radiation Shielding Applications

20261 citationOpen accessUniversity Ferhat Abbas of Setif

Abstract

Abstract The present study details the design and integral characterization of a novel polyethylene naphthalate (PEN)/tungsten oxide (WO 3 ) composite designed for gamma radiation shielding applications. The composites were prepared by melt processing, incorporating WO 3 at 5, 10, and 20% by mass as a high-Z filler to enhance the radiation attenuation efficiency. We performed morphological, structural, and thermal characterizations of these composites using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Additionally, the tensile test was performed to evaluate the mechanical strength. The shielding performance was evaluated by determining the mass attenuation coefficient (MAC, µ m ), half-value layer (HVL), tenth-value layer (TVL), and mean free path (MFP) across photon energies ranging from 31 to 1332 keV. These parameters were determined experimentally using the HPGe gamma detector and the NIST XCOM database, and were theoretically simulated using the EGS4 Monte Carlo approach. A strong agreement was found between the experimental, simulation, and theoretical attenuation values, confirming the effectiveness of the composite in gamma radiation shielding. The MAC value of the pure PEN, which was 0.080 cm 2 /g at 662 keV, was increased to 0.086 cm 2 /g by introducing 20 wt% of WO 3 . The results indicate the potential of PEN/WO 3 composites as lightweight, efficient shielding materials for radiation protection applications, particularly in the 31–276 keV energy range.

Research topics

  • Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis
  • Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation
  • Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1007/s13369-026-11165-6

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.