MARATTO

article

Developing and Testing an Engineering Framework for Curiosity-Driven and Humble AI in Clinical Decision Support

Abstract

Abstract Background We present BODHI (Balanced, Open-minded, Diagnostic, Humble, and Inquisitive), an engineering framework for curiosity-driven and humble clinical decision support AI. Despite growing capabilities, large language models (LLMs) often express inappropriate confidence, conflating statistical pattern recognition with genuine medical understanding. BODHI addresses this through a dual-reflective architecture that: (1) decomposes epistemic uncertainty into task-specific dimensions, and (2) constrains model responses using virtue-based stance rules derived from a Virtue Activation Matrix. Methods We validate the framework through controlled evaluation on 200 clinical vignettes from HealthBench Hard, assessing GPT-4o-mini and GPT-4.1-mini across 5 random seeds (1,800 total observations). Statistical analysis included bootstrap resampling, paired t-tests, and effect size computation (Supplementary Materials S3) Findings BODHI significantly improved overall clinical response quality (GPT-4.1-mini: +17.3pp, p < 0.0001, Cohen’s d = 0.50; GPT-4o-mini: +7.4pp, p < 0.0001, Cohen’s d = 0.22) while achieving very large effect sizes on curiosity (context-seeking rate: Cohen’s d = 16.38 and 19.54) and humility (hedging: d = 5.80 for GPT-4.1-mini) metrics. Crucially, 97.3% of GPT-4.1-mini responses and 73.5% of GPT-4o-mini responses included appropriate clarifying questions, compared to 7.8% and 0.0% at baseline, demonstrating the framework’s effectiveness in eliciting information-gathering behavior. Interpretation These findings suggest LLMs can be reliably constrained to operate within epistemic boundaries when provided with structured uncertainty decomposition and virtue-aligned response rules, offering a pathway toward safer clinical AI deployment.

Research topics

  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Psychological and Educational Research Studies
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.64898/2026.02.06.26345664

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.