MARATTO

article · Desalination and Water Treatment

Determination of the level of chromium (III) and comparison of chemical precipitating agents to recover and reuse it from tannery waste water

202423 citationsOpen accessDebre Tabor University

In plain language

Tannery effluent is frequently released into ecosystems without treatment, threatening living organisms because of its substantial organic load and chromium concentration. To address this issue, an investigation evaluated different chemical agents for precipitating, recovering, and reusing chromium (III) from tannery wastewater. The process involved physicochemical characterisation alongside chemical precipitation tests, with chromium levels measured through flame atomic absorption spectroscopy and evaluated using statistical analysis of variance. Testing revealed distinct differences in the volume of sludge generated by each agent: magnesium oxide yielded twenty-five percent, calcium hydroxide generated thirty-one percent, and sodium hydroxide produced forty-four percent. Because it generates the lowest proportion of sludge among the tested compounds, magnesium oxide presents an effective precipitating agent that could minimise environmental harm and support industrial sustainability efforts.

Key takeaways

  • Untreated tannery wastewater contains high organic loads and chromium (III) that pose environmental risks.
  • Chemical precipitating agents were evaluated to recover and reuse chromium (III) from tannery effluent.
  • Magnesium oxide generated the lowest sludge volume at 25 percent, compared to 31 percent for calcium hydroxide and 44 percent for sodium hydroxide.
  • Using magnesium oxide as a precipitant offers potential environmental benefits by minimising the volume of treatment sludge.

Why it matters

Leather tanning generates hazardous wastewater rich in toxic chromium, which endangers aquatic life and human health if released untreated. Finding efficient precipitation methods allows industrial facilities to capture and recycle heavy metals before discharge. Lowering the volume of resulting sludge significantly reduces hazardous waste handling, storage costs, and ecological contamination, supporting safer and more sustainable industrial effluent management.

Commercialisation angle

This approach is relevant to tannery operators, industrial effluent treatment facilities, and environmental engineering firms seeking to recover chromium (III) and reduce disposal costs. The work is applied research tested at laboratory scale on wastewater samples. To move towards commercial implementation, further testing is needed to evaluate continuous-flow operations, process economics, and the practical reuse of the recovered chromium in industrial tanning processes.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

Most tannery wastes are discharged into the natural environment without any treatment system and pose a potential negative impact on living things due to their high organic loading and chromium content. In this study, a comparison of chemical precipitating agents to recover and reuse chromium (III) from tannery waste water was done. The study was conducted by performing physicochemical characterization and chemical precipitation. The Cr concentration was determined using the flame atomic absorption spectroscopy (FAAS) method. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS program through one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). In terms of sludge volume, magnesium oxide produced 25%, calcium hydroxide 31%, and sodium hydroxide 44%. The findings have implications for global sustainability, as the use of magnesium oxide as a precipitating agent results in a smaller sludge volume and potentially less environmental impact.

Research topics

  • Chromium effects and bioremediation
  • Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Analytical chemistry methods development

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100150

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.