MARATTO

article · East European Journal of Physics

Determination of Setup Margin for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma by Using Electroinc Portal Imaging Device

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to assess three-dimensional (3D) setup mistakes and provide optimal margins for planned target volume (PTV) coverage in head and neck radiation. Methods: Ten patients participated in the trial, receiving IMRT in conjunction with weekly electronic portal imaging (EPI). A total of 170 portal pictures were analyzed. The systematic (S) and random (s) errors in the population of patients with head and neck cancer were assessed using portal images in the caudocranial longitudinal (CC) and left-right lateral (LR) orientations, measured within the anterior-posterior (AP) field. The clinical-to-planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margins were determined in accordance with ICRU Report 62 guidelines and van Herk’s formulae. Results: The group systematic errors and random errors were 0.19 and 0.26 cm , respectively in the anteroposterior direction; the group systematic errors and random errors were 0.15 cm and 0.24 cm in SI direction, respectively; the group systematic errors and random errors were 0.13 cm and 0.25 cm in LR direction, respectively; According to the classical van-Herk formula MPTV =2.5Σ +0.7σ, we figured out the ideal PTV margins (MPTV) based on the setup errors and 0.65 cm, 0.55 cm, and 0.5 cm were required in the AP, SI, and RL directions. Discussion and conclusions: we can conclude that a 6-mm extension of CTV to PTV margin, as the optimal margin and can be reduced with increasing frequency of online verification (daily imaging) or for patients where the prescribed does not exceed tolerance doses for organs at risk.

Research topics

  • Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Brain Tumor Detection and Classification

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.26565/2312-4334-2025-1-36

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.