MARATTO

article · Ministry of Science and Technology Vietnam

Determination of critical properties of orange peel for a polymer reinforcement material

20242 citationsOpen accessUniversity of Lagos

Abstract

Accurately determining the critical properties of orange peels ensures composite engineers can successfully monitor and control in-service composite failures. However, the current approaches to property determination are deficient, lack critical analysis, and are not wide-ranging. Thus, they fail to accurately establish the important properties of orange peels. To overcome this challenge, this article establishes the compressive strength, heat absorption, and electrical conductivity of an orange peel polymer to understand the behaviour of the material in lightweight composite applications. Three experimental sets were used to determine the three mentioned properties. The results obtained showed that the average heat energy absorbed by the samples of collected orange peels in 28 poly bags was 79.32 J. The highest and lowest heat absorbed by the samples was found to be 162.03 and 11.08 J, respectively. The average electrical conductivity was measured at 0.025σwhile the average resistance, length, and surface area of 20 orange peel samples were found to be 27.24Ω, 2.92 cm, and 7.02 cm2, respectively. The resistance of the orange peels had the greatest influence on their electrical conductivity. Lastly, the compressive shear strengths of the 0.300, 0.425, and 0.600-mm orange peel particulates were found to be 41.86, 14.82, and 9.58 kN/m2, respectively. With this information, composite design engineers using orange peel reinforcements could improve their design accuracies and extend in-service composite lives.

Research topics

  • Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
  • Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
  • Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.31276/vjste.66(2).61-68

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.