MARATTO

article · Cancer Research Journal

Determinants of Low Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Sexually Active Women in an Urban Health District in Cameroon

2025Open accessUniversity of Douala

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer remains a major public health concern in low- and middle-income countries. Screening uptake in Cameroon is far below the World Health Organization’s elimination targets. This study assessed socio-demographic, economic, and informational determinants of low cervical cancer screening uptake among sexually active women in an urban district of Yaoundé. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from September to October 2023 in the Biyem-Assi Health District. A convenience sample of 250 sexually active women aged 25–59 years completed a pre-tested structured questionnaire. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with non-participation. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Overall, 89.0% of participants had never been screened. Independent predictors of non-participation were being single (AOR 5.79; 95% CI 3.60–9.45), lack of awareness of screening centers (AOR 5.02; 95% CI 1.24–20.29), no health insurance (AOR 3.91; 95% CI 1.70–8.98), poor knowledge of cervical cancer (AOR 3.16; 95% CI 1.12–8.94), unemployment (AOR 2.16; 95% CI 1.18-4.00), and having ≤1 child (AOR 1.94; 95% CI 1.21-3.12). Conclusion: Cervical cancer screening uptake is critically low in this urban population. The main barriers relate to socioeconomic vulnerability and lack of specific information on where screening services are offered. Improving service visibility, reducing costs, and integrating screening into routine health services may help increase uptake, although further research is required to evaluate feasibility and impact.

Research topics

  • Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Reproductive tract infections research

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.11648/j.crj.20251304.13

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.