MARATTO

article · WORLD JOURNAL OF FINANCE AND INVESTMENT RESEARCH

Deposit Volatility in Digital Age: Cashless Policy and Liquidity Management in Emerging Market

Abstract

This study examined the effect of cashless policy instruments on the liquidity of deposit money banks (DMBs) in Nigeria from 2010 to 2023. This study evaluated ATM usage, POS terminal deployment, and mobile banking adoption on the liquidity ratio of Nigerian deposit money banks. Grounded in the Diamond-Dybvig model of bank runs and the Diffusion of Innovation Theory, this study assessed the macro-prudential effect of cashless instruments using secondary data from the Central Bank of Nigeria Statistical Bulletin, the Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation Annual Report, and the Nigeria Inter-Bank Settlement System. Econometric analysis was conducted via the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model. The findings showed that ATM usage yielded a negative but statistically insignificant effect on bank liquidity. POS terminal usage demonstrated no significant relationship with liquidity and, mobile banking exerted a negative and statistically insignificant effect on liquidity. Thus, findings revealed a critical liquidity paradox that expanded digital financial access and transaction volumes do not guarantee improved bank liquidity positions. Meaningful liquidity enhancement hinges on deep operational integration and regulatory alignment of digital channels with core banking functions. To translate cashless adoption into tangible liquidity gains, regulators must shift strategy from basic channel expansion to value-creating infrastructure. Specifically, policies should strengthen ATM cash management, transform POS agent networks into deposit-mobilization hubs, and align mobile banking ecosystems with prudential liquidity frameworks.

Research topics

  • Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
  • Economic Growth and Development
  • Microfinance and Financial Inclusion

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.56201/wjfir.v10.no6.2026.pg45.58

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.