article · Data in Brief
approach. The synthesized compound (parent compound) using experimental approach as well as its derivatives was subjected to computational examination using appropriate software. The investigated compounds were optimized using Spartan 14 while the docking study was executed via Pymol, AutoDock Tool, AutoDock Vina and discovery studio. The descriptors obtained (2D and 3D) were screened and the descriptor with highest capacity (squared correlation coefficient) was correlated to the calculated binding affinity. More so, the docking analysis was performed on the investigated linear rgd-containing peptides and angiotensin converting enzyme (PDB ID: 3nxq) via docking software and the resulted scoring and the types of the interaction observed were presented. Furthermore, (S)-dimethyl 2-(2-((S)-2-((R)-1-((S)-2-((S)-2-((S)-3-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-(1,3-dioxoisoindolin-2-yl)propanamido)-4-(methylthio)butanamido)-4-methylpentanoyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxamido)-5-(3-((2,2,4,5,7-pentamethyl-2,3-dihydrobenzofuran-6-yl)sulfonyl)guanidino)pentanamido)acetamido)succinate (AB5) (compound with lowest binding affinity) and metformin were subjected to ADMET analysis and the resulted outcome were reported appropriately.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2023.109478
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.