MARATTO

article · IEEE Access

Customer Personality Analysis for Churn Prediction Using Hybrid Ensemble Models and Class Balancing Techniques

202312 citationsOpen accessKafr el-Sheikh University

Abstract

Today’s businesses rely heavily on focused marketing to improve their chances of growing and keeping their consumer base. Internet behemoths like Google and Facebook have expanded their business models around targeted advertisements that support business growth. Customer personality identification helps for churn prediction for companies. This problem arises in several companies where customer leaves companies for many reasons. This gap leads to conduct study for customer personality analysis. The collected dataset was highly imbalanced in nature. Two class balancing approaches CTGAN (Conditional tabular Generative adversarial networks) and SMOTE (Synthetic minority oversampling technique) has been utilized to equalize the both classes. There are three ensemble approaches such as bagging, boosting and stacking have been utilized for modeling purpose bagging approach uses Random Forest (RF) boosting utilizes XGBoost (XGB), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM) and ADA Boost (ADA B). The proposed Hybrid Model HSLR comprises of RF, XGB, ADA Boost, LGBM approaches as base classifiers and LR as a Meta classifier. Three testing independent set, k-fold with 5 and 10 folds have been utilized. To evaluate the performance of classifiers evaluation metrics such as Accuracy score, Precision, Recall, F1 score, MCC and ROC score have been utilized. The SMOTE generated data has shown results as compare with CTGAN generated data. The SMOTE approach has shown the highest results of 94.06, 94.23, 94.28, 94.05, 88.13 and 0.984 as accuracy score, Precision, recall, F1, MCC and Roc score respectively.

Research topics

  • Customer churn and segmentation
  • Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
  • Customer Service Quality and Loyalty

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1109/access.2023.3334641

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.