MARATTO

article · Evaluation

Culturally responsive data analysis for evaluations in contexts of fragility, conflict, and violence

Abstract

This article aims to provide practical guidance for conducting culturally responsive data analysis for evaluations in contexts of fragility, conflict and violence. To this end, we propose three core principles – or ‘golden rules’—that must be taken into consideration when analyzing such data. These include the engagement of wise stakeholders in data analysis, the consideration of diversity in detecting and treating outliers and the documentation of all data analysis processes, including the assumptions made. We are aware that applying these principles may pose practical challenges given the complexity of fragile and conflict-based environments. However, doing so can enhance the validity of evaluation findings and their acceptability. Further research is encouraged to empirically test the proposed principles in conflict regions, notably in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Research topics

  • Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1177/13563890241247053

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.