review · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Human societies enforce social norms through various methods, including direct revenge by victims, altruistic intervention by third parties, and formal sanctions by institutional representatives. While certain regularities appear across cultures, significant differences exist in how often and in what ways communities punish individuals who violate rules. These variations can stem from shared psychological mechanisms adapting to local socio-ecological conditions, or from distinct cultural evolutionary processes. Existing research across anthropology, economics, and psychology has often addressed these factors in isolation, leading to disconnected empirical findings. Integrating these diverse socio-ecological and cultural perspectives provides a more coherent understanding of shared and unique punishment practices. A unified framework can help future cross-societal studies examine domain-specific punishment, the broader variety of tactics used to uphold community standards, and the mechanisms driving changes in social norms over time.
Understanding how societies enforce rules offers crucial insight into human cooperation and cultural diversity. Connecting findings across anthropology, economics, and psychology helps clarify why communities respond differently to rule breaking. This broader perspective illuminates how collective standards are maintained, providing a clearer foundation for examining how societies adopt new behavioural norms, navigate conflict, or reform existing governance and justice systems.
The abstract does not indicate an application pathway.
AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.
Across human societies, people are sometimes willing to punish norm violators. Such punishment can take the form of revenge from victims, seemingly altruistic intervention from third parties, or legitimized sanctioning from institutional representatives. Although prior work has documented cross-cultural regularities in norm enforcement, substantial variation exists in the prevalence and forms of punishment across societies. Such cross-societal variation may arise from universal psychological mechanisms responding to different socio-ecological conditions, or from cultural evolutionary processes, resulting in different norm enforcement systems. To date, empirical evidence from comparative studies across diverse societies has remained disconnected, owing to a lack of interdisciplinary integration and a prevalent tendency of empirical studies to focus on different underpinnings of variation in norm enforcement. To provide a more complete view of the shared and unique aspects of punishment across societies, we review prior research in anthropology, economics and psychology, and take a first step towards integrating the plethora of socio-ecological and cultural factors proposed to explain cross-societal variation in norm enforcement. We conclude by discussing how future cross-societal research can use diverse methodologies to illuminate key questions on the domain-specificity of punishment, the diversity of tactics supporting social norms, and their role in processes of norm change. This article is part of the theme issue 'Social norm change: drivers and consequences'.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0034
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.
