MARATTO

article · Clinical Optometry

Corneal Thickness, Curvature and Topographic Indices: Implications for Keratoconus Screening in a South African University Clinic Population

2026Open accessUniversity of Limpopo

Abstract

Background: Keratoconus (KC) is a progressive corneal ectatic disorder characterised by thinning and irregular steepening, which may lead to visual impairment if not detected early. Most diagnostic thresholds are derived from non-African populations, limiting their relevance in local settings. Aim: To profile corneal thickness, curvature, eccentricity and topographic indices, and assess their implications for keratoconus screening in a South African university clinic population. Methods: A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted using clinical data from patients attending a university optometry clinic. Mean central corneal thickness (CCT), radius of curvature ( r ), eccentricity ( e ) and KC related indices of 300 clinic patients were measured using Oculus Pentacam. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyse the data. Results: Corneal parameters were generally within normal ranges. The mean CCT was 504.79 ± 33.12 μm. The mean r was 7.83 ± 0.28 mm, indicating relatively flatter corneas compared to some international populations. Mean e- value was 0.47 ± 0.13, suggesting prolate corneal profiles. Keratoconus related indices were largely within normal limits, although they appeared more conservative than corneal thickness in identifying suspected ectasia. Weak to moderate correlations were observed between variables. Conclusion: Corneal characteristics were within normal limits but showed subtle population specific variation. A multi-parameter approach integrating thickness, curvature and indices is recommended to improve KC screening and to strengthen region-specific diagnostic thresholds. Keywords: keratoconus, corneal thickness, corneal curvature, eccentricity, ectasia screening, topographic indices, South Africa

Research topics

  • Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
  • Ocular Surface and Contact Lens

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.2147/opto.s622334

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.