article · The Science of The Total Environment
Biochar is widely promoted as a strategy to mitigate nitrogen (N) losses from soils, yet its effectiveness varies strongly with N source (inorganic or organic) and biochar properties. To clarify these contrasting responses, we conducted an integrated assessment combining a 98-day soil incubation experiment, a 10-day ammonia (NH 3 ) volatilization experiment, a 60-day column leaching experiment, and a scenario-based apparent soil N partitioning framework. When co-applied with urea, biochar suppressed nitrification and reduced soil nitrate-N (NO 3 − -N) accumulation consistent with enhanced microbial immobilization and/or ammonium retention. However, relative to the urea control, NH 3 volatilization increased by 32–50% with biochar, and leaching losses also increased: ammonium-N (NH 4 + -N) leaching increased by 43–58% at high biochar application rates (20 t ha −1 ) while NO 3 − -N leaching increased 15–39%. In contrast, biochar combined with anaerobic digestion effluent (ADE) significantly enhanced nitrification and mitigated N losses. Compared with the ADE control, biochar reduced NH 3 volatilization by 15–33% across all biochar treatments and NO 3 − -N leaching decreased by 8–10% at the high application rates. However, NH 4 + -N leaching remained low across all treatments (0.11–0.60 mg N column −1 ). These reductions in N loss were associated with patterns consistent with interactions between ADE-derived organic components and biochar surfaces that may have contributed to reduced NO 3 − -N mobility, together with a more balanced microbial community structure. Overall, our results demonstrated that biochar was not a universal mitigation tool. While it exacerbated gaseous and leaching losses when combined with fast-release urea, it substantially enhanced N stabilization when paired with ADE. Fertilizer-specific biochar management, using low application rates with urea and high-temperature biochar at higher rates with ADE, provided a practical pathway to improve N use efficiency while mitigating environmental N losses.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2026.181941
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.