MARATTO

article · PLOS Sustainability and Transformation

Continuing recovery of wolves in Europe

202534 citationsOpen accessNorth-West University

In plain language

Wolf populations across Europe have experienced substantial recovery, expanding by 58 percent over a decade to surpass 21,500 individuals by 2022. This growth has occurred despite heavily modified landscapes, dense human populations, agriculture, industry, and urbanisation. Improved monitoring techniques have helped track these increasing trends across most countries. However, expansion brings practical challenges. Wolves kill roughly 56,000 domestic animals annually in the European Union, resulting in approximately 17 million euros each year in damage compensation. Positive economic effects, including wildlife tourism and fewer vehicle collisions with wild ungulates, are currently under-studied. Conservation is underpinned by legal frameworks such as the Bern Convention and the European Union Habitats Directive, alongside targeted programmes and stakeholder platforms. Achieving long-term coexistence requires addressing livestock losses, game competition, and public anxiety amidst divergent social and political debates.

Key takeaways

  • European wolf populations rose by 58 percent over a decade to exceed 21,500 individuals by 2022.
  • Depredation of domestic animals by wolves leads to annual compensation costs of 17 million euros across European countries.
  • Potential economic benefits of wolf presence, including tourism and reduced ungulate traffic accidents, remain insufficiently studied.
  • Coexistence requires balancing legal protections with the management of livestock loss, game competition, and public concerns.

Why it matters

The return of large carnivores to densely populated regions demonstrates ecological resilience, but it also creates direct economic and social friction. Quantifying population growth, livestock damage, and compensation costs helps policymakers and local communities understand the trade-offs of conservation. Establishing balanced management strategies is vital for maintaining public support and reducing conflicts between rural livelihoods and protected wildlife.

Commercialisation angle

The abstract does not indicate an application pathway.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

The recovery of wolves ( Canis lupus ) across Europe is a notable conservation success in a region with extensive human alteration of landscapes and high human population densities. We provide a comprehensive update on wolf populations in Europe, estimated at over 21,500 individuals by 2022, representing a 58% increase over the past decade. Despite the challenges of high human densities and significant land use for agriculture, industry, and urbanization, wolves have demonstrated remarkable adaptability and increasing population trends in most European countries. Improved monitoring techniques, although varying in quality and scope, have played a crucial role in tracking this recovery. Annually, wolves kill approximately 56,000 domestic animals in the EU, a risk unevenly distributed and differently handled across regions. Damage compensation costs 17 million EUR every year to European countries. Positive economic impacts from wolf presence, such as those related to reducing traffic accidents with wild ungulates or supporting wildlife tourism, remain under studied. Wolf recovery in Europe is supported by diverse policy and legal instruments such as LIFE programs, stakeholder platforms, as well as the EU Habitats Directive and the Bern Convention. Coexisting with newly established wolf populations in Europe entails managing impacts on human activities, including livestock depredation, competition for game, and fear of attacks on humans, amidst varying social and political views on wolf recovery. Sustainable coexistence continues to operate in evolving and complex social, economic, and political landscapes, often characterized by intense debates regarding wolf policies.

Research topics

  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Human-Animal Interaction Studies

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pstr.0000158

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.