article · Discover Chemistry.
Diphtheria toxin, a major virulence factor of Corynebacterium diphtheriae, continues to pose significant therapeutic challenges in the face of antimicrobial resistance. Flavonoids, owing to their structural diversity and bioactivity, represent attractive scaffolds for inhibitor development. This study employed advanced computational approaches to identify potent flavonoid-based inhibitors targeting the catalytic domain of diphtheria toxin. A curated flavonoid library (n = 264) was subjected to druglikeness and PAINS filtration, yielding 104 candidates for hierarchical molecular docking (HTVS → SP → XP) against diphtheria toxin (PDB ID: 1DTP). Binding free energies were validated by MM-GBSA, while induced-fit docking captured receptor conformational adaptability. Pharmacokinetic and safety attributes were evaluated using SwissADME and DeepPK platforms. Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) and the co-crystallized ligand served as benchmarks. Among flavonoids, silymarin recorded the lowest docking score of − 8.399 kcal/mol, indicating stronger interaction with the diphtheria toxin active site compared to EGCG (–7.698 kcal/mol), though higher than the co-crystallized ligand (–11.089 kcal/mol). MM-GBSA confirmed the thermodynamic stability of both silymarin (–64.63 kcal/mol) and EGCG (–63.43 kcal/mol). In terms of inhibition constants, the co-crystallized ligand showed the strongest binding with a $$\:{k}_{i}$$ of 7.34 nM, indicating the highest inhibitory potential. Silymarin exhibited a moderate affinity with a Ki of 694 nM, while epigallocatechin gallate had the weakest inhibition at 2210 nM. ADMET evaluation demonstrated that silymarin exhibited superior druglikeness, no PAINS alerts, and a safer toxicity profile relative to EGCG. Silymarin emerges as a promising lead flavonoid scaffold for diphtheria toxin inhibition, combining favorable binding energetics with strong pharmacokinetic and safety attributes, thereby warranting further experimental validation and optimization.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1007/s44371-025-00377-8
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.