MARATTO

article · In Silico Research in Biomedicine

Computational identification of potential COX-2 inhibitors from Devil’s Claw for anti-inflammation

Abstract

This study evaluated the anti-inflammatory potential of thirty-three phytoconstituents from Devil’s Claw, Harpagophytum ( H. ) procumbens, as inhibitors of human cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2; PDB ID: 5F19 ). We employed a comprehensive in silico pipeline combining molecular docking, ADMET profiling, and 500 ns MD simulations, followed by MMPBSA analysis. Eight compounds displayed binding affinities (≤ -8.4 kcal/mol) comparable to the reference inhibitors, diclofenac and SC-558. ADMET and drug-likeness analyses identified flavonoids (fisetin, kaempferol, luteolin) as the most pharmacokinetically suitable candidates for oral development, combining high intestinal absorption (74-82%), no Lipinski violations, and low aggregation probabilities (all compounds ≤ 0.12; luteolin showed the highest aggregation probability at 0.122), though experimental confirmation remains necessary. The extended MD simulations indicated generally stable protein-ligand interactions for most complexes, with harpagoside showing notable conformational flexibility. MMPBSA analysis revealed favorable binding free energies for the glycosides (isoacteoside, ΔG TOTAL = -38.5 ± 6.1 kcal/mol, and harpagoside, ΔG TOTAL = -32.0 ± 4.3 kcal/mol), driven by electrostatic and hydrophobic forces. The findings from this study support the putative COX-2 inhibitory potential of H. procumbens . These outcomes are complementary rather than contradictory, flavonoids are prioritised as oral lead candidates on pharmacokinetic grounds, while glycosides represent high-affinity scaffold leads that warrant formulation-based development strategies. Both groups highlight H. procumbens as a promising source of plant-derived COX-2 inhibitors and identify candidate leads that warrant experimental validation for the development of safer, plant-based anti-inflammatory agents.

Research topics

  • Flavonoids in Medical Research
  • Phytochemistry and Biological Activities
  • Natural product bioactivities and synthesis

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.insi.2026.100370

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.