article · Results in Engineering
• A new metaheuristic, the Competition-Amensalism Optimization (CAO), is introduced based on ecological interaction theory. • CAO employs competition and amensalism operators to balance global exploration and local exploitation. • The algorithm is parameter-free, offering simple implementation and strong adaptability across problem types, which provide fast, robust convergence, avoiding premature stagnation in complex landscapes. • CAO achieves superior performance on 32 benchmark functions and seven real-world engineering problems. • CAO demonstrates excellent scalability, outperforming state-of-the-are optimizers on 30-, 100-, and 1000-dimensional problems. This study introduces a novel metaheuristic optimization algorithm, termed the Competition-Amensalism Optimization (CAO), inspired by competitive interactions in ecological systems. CAO employs a dual-phase search strategy: a competition phase to enhance global exploration and an amensalism phase to intensify local exploitation. This synergy ensures a robust balance between exploration and exploitation, which is essential for addressing complex, high-dimensional optimization problems. The performance of CAO was rigorously evaluated using 32 diverse benchmark functions and seven classical engineering design problems. Experimental results demonstrate that CAO consistently delivers high-quality solutions and exhibits superior convergence behavior compared to several state-of-the-art metaheuristic algorithms. Its adaptability enables strong performance on both unimodal and multimodal landscapes, indicating broad applicability diverse problem types. The promising results highlight CAO’s potential for real-world optimization problems. Future research will focus on adaptive interaction strategies, constrained and multi-objective optimization extensions, and large-scale validation under noisy and dynamically changing optimizations environments.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2026.111048
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.