MARATTO

article · Journal of Public Health in Africa

Comparison of two polymerase chain reaction assays, DaAn Gene (DaAn Gene 2019-ncov) and Cepheid (Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2) for Delta and Omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2 detection in Yaoundé, Cameroon

20251 citationOpen accessUniversity of Douala

Abstract

Background: New severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants may affect diagnostic test accuracy. Aim: To evaluate the performance of two reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays, DaAn Gene and Cepheid, for detecting Delta and Omicron variants. Setting: Nasopharyngeal samples were collected in Yaoundé, Cameroon, between October 2021 and December 2022. Methods: Nasopharyngeal samples were tested with both assays. Samples with a cycle threshold (CT) ≤ 28 were sequenced. Cohen’s kappa coefficient assessed assay agreement. Results: We compared 294 samples. At CT ≤ 40, DaAn Gene showed a 59.2% (n = 174/294) positivity rate versus 57.8% (n = 170/294) for Cepheid (χ2 = 0.695, p = 0.4044). Agreement was 95.91% (n = 282/294) with κ = 0.95. DaAn Gene showed a 58.2% (n = 171/294) positivity rate versus 54.4% (n = 160/294) for Cepheid at CT ≤ 37 (p = 0.5058), with 95.6% agreement (κ = 0.95). At CT ≤ 33, DaAn Gene was 56.5% (n = 166/294) positive versus 54.1% (n = 159/294) for Cepheid (p = 0.6187), with 96.93% agreement (κ = 0.938). For 167 samples with CT ≤ 28, agreement was 97.0% (κ = 0.97) across variants. These RT-PCR assays effectively detected Delta and Omicron variants. Conclusion: The emergence of Delta and Omicron variants did not significantly impact the diagnostic performance of these routine RT-PCR assays. Contribution: This study confirms their continued effectiveness in detecting these variants in this setting.

Research topics

  • SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.4102/jphia.v16i1.1282

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.