MARATTO

article

Comparison of Free and Open Source WCAG Accessibility Evaluation Tools

20233 citationsIbn Tofail University

Abstract

Access to the internet is essential to any individual, including people with disabilities that encounter many challenges and obstacles while browsing the Web. To tackle those problems, the Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) [1], since its creation in 1997, has worked on improving accessibility of the Web for people with disabilities by providing guidelines (WCAG) and tools for Web Accessibility Assessments. This study aims to compare free and open-source tools from the official (W3C) list of WAETs for evaluating websites against the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 standards [2]; the comparison is based on the coverage error ratio (CER) metric that compares the performance of WAETs in identifying Web accessibility problems.

Research topics

  • Digital Accessibility for Disabilities

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1145/3607720.3607722

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.