MARATTO

article · The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal

Comparative study of gamma nail versus dynamic hip screw in fixation of unstable peri-trochanteric fractures regarding operative outcomes

2024Open accessAssiut University

Abstract

Background Hip fractures are considered one of the major health problems in aging societies. These fractures are correlated with increased disability and mortality and a decreased quality of life. Objective To compare the operative outcomes of Gamma nail versus dynamic hip screw in fixation of unstable peri-trochanteric fractures. Methods This is an open labelled Randomized controlled clinical trial conducted on patients presented to orthopedic department with unstable peri- trochanteric fracture between June 2020 and December 2021. 60 patients included in this study. The patients were randomized into two groups each group contains 30 patients, Group A (patients with peri-trochanteric fractures treated with DHS) and Group B (patients with peri-trochanteric fractures treated with Gamma nail). Results The difference between Gamma group and DHS group regarding Parker mobility score was highly statistically significant after 1.5 MD [95% CI]−0.49 [−0.78–−0.21] P value <0.01 and very highly statistically significant after 3 MD [95% CI]−0.78 [−1.06–−0.48], P value <0.001, while there was no statistically significant difference after 6 and 12 months. The Gamma group does not statistically significant differ from DHS group regarding time to union MD [95% CI] 0.23 [−0.16–0.63] months, P value >0.05. Conclusion This study shows that Gamma nail is a safe and reliable modality in the management of peri-trochanteric fractures. It has lesser operative time, and lesser blood loss and comparable results regarding the time to union and hospital study.

Research topics

  • Hip and Femur Fractures
  • Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
  • Hip disorders and treatments

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.4103/eoj.eoj_92_23

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.