article · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Abstarct The design and implementation of national housing programs serve as a core indicator of socioeconomic stability and welfare delivery. While housing is universally acknowledged as a fundamental human need, the strategies employed to deliver affordable housing differ vastly across economic contexts. This study evaluates the systemic divergence between long-term housing strategies in developed nations and the execution realities within Nigeria using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) methodology. By analyzing academic literature and national policy documents, this paper investigates how the interactions between seven core strategic themes that include: funds, schemes, governments, implementation, development, land, and rurality influence public housing outcomes. The findings reveal that while developed countries achieve structural stability through high institutional continuity, deep secondary mortgage markets, and automated distribution pipelines, the Nigerian housing ecosystem suffers from severe systemic friction. Restrictive land tenure under the 1978 Land Use Act, volatile commercial interest rates, political discontinuity, and a reliance on analog allocation workflows create interdependent loops that exclude low-and-medium-income earners. Localized empirical data confirms that rigid credit barriers systematically lock out public servants, while manual administrative bottlenecks leave completed housing projects vulnerable to bureaucratic capture. The study concludes that minor project-level interventions are insufficient to resolve the affordable housing deficit. Instead, it recommends substantive legislative reform of land laws, the institutionalization of flexible collateral models, and the immediate deployment of automated digital house allocation management systems to ensure equitable, sustainable housing delivery. Keywords: Affordable Housing; Housing Policy; Structural Friction; Digital Allocation Systems; Nigeria
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21504687
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.