MARATTO

article · World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences

Comparative analysis of Internet of Things (IOT) implementation: A case study of Ghana and the USA - vision, architectural elements, and future directions

202431 citationsOpen accessUniversity of Ibadan

In plain language

Internet of Things adoption follows markedly different trajectories in Ghana compared to the United States. These variations stem from differences in existing technological infrastructure, economic capacity, and broader societal contexts. Strategic visions and development goals differ between the two nations, which directly shapes how architectural elements such as hardware, software systems, network solutions, and data management are implemented. Both environments face barriers to rollout, encompassing technical hurdles, regulatory and policy constraints, and economic limitations. Evaluating these contrasting landscapes highlights emerging trends and opportunities, pointing towards targeted developmental pathways and informed policy measures that address the distinct operating conditions of both emerging and advanced technological environments.

Key takeaways

  • Ghana and the United States follow distinct approaches to Internet of Things implementation due to differences in infrastructure, economics, and societal influences.
  • Architectural elements, including hardware, software, networking, and data management, reflect the specific developmental context of each country.
  • Implementation faces technical, economic, and policy constraints in both developing and developed settings.
  • Comparative analysis reveals emerging trends that can guide future IoT initiatives and regulatory frameworks.

Why it matters

Understanding how different countries implement connected technologies prevents the assumption that one strategy fits all. By examining the operational differences between advanced and developing economies, planners and policymakers can design technology strategies, digital infrastructure, and regulatory frameworks that realistically match local technical capabilities, economic conditions, and national development goals.

Commercialisation angle

The research serves as high-level strategic intelligence rather than a deployable product, making it early-stage and distant from immediate commercial use. It provides actionable context for IoT solution providers, hardware vendors, and network operators planning to introduce data management and connected devices into emerging markets such as Ghana, helping them anticipate regional infrastructural constraints and regulatory requirements.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of the Internet of Things (IoT) implementation in Ghana and the USA, focusing on their respective visions, architectural elements, and future directions. The study begins with an introduction to IoT's significance in modern society, followed by a detailed methodology outlining the research design, data collection methods, and criteria for comparative analysis. The findings reveal distinct approaches to IoT implementation in Ghana and the USA, reflecting varying levels of technological infrastructure, economic impact, and societal influence. The analysis delves into the comparative aspects of IoT vision, including strategic goals and technological advancements, and examines the architectural elements such as hardware, software, network solutions, and data management. The paper also addresses the challenges and barriers in IoT implementation, highlighting technical, policy, and economic constraints. Furthermore, it explores emerging trends, opportunities, and recommendations for future IoT development, providing final thoughts on the trajectories of IoT in both countries. This study contributes to the understanding of IoT's role in different national contexts and offers valuable insights for future IoT initiatives and policies.

Research topics

  • Smart Cities and Technologies

Sustainable Development Goals

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.30574/wjaets.2024.11.1.0035

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.