MARATTO

article · Global Journal of Researches in Engineering

Comparative Analysis of Friction Coefficient Evolution in Hydroelectric Dam Penstocks: Theoretical vs. Numerical Methods

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the evolution of the friction coefficient throughout a full penstock using two different approaches. Two approaches were considered in order to assess their effectiveness in predicting head loss. A theoretical approach that based on direct determination using the commonly used Colebrook-While formula. A graphical approach that based on numerical modeling of the structure under study using Gambit 2.2 software. For the theoretical approach, the results show that whatever the other parameters set out in the Colebrook-White formula (Reynolds number, diameter and absolute roughness), only absolute roughness has a visible impact on the result obtained. For the numerical approach, the results obtained show that the friction coefficient is neither identical on the same wall, nor identical in the same portion. Nor is it identical in the same section of the pipe, as shown by the theoretical approach. This shows that head loss in a section of pipe can change over time.

Research topics

  • Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
  • Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.34257/gjreavol24is2pg13

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.