MARATTO

article · Heliyon

Community participation in crime prevention and control in rural Nigeria

202048 citationsOpen accessOsun State University

In plain language

Rural communities in Nigeria face rising crime rates, with theft being particularly prevalent. A lack of essential infrastructure, such as good roads and communication networks, limits the ability of the police to detect and prevent criminal activities in these regions. In response, local communities have turned to informal community policing to safeguard their neighbourhoods. Most criminal suspects held at police stations are youths, driven toward crime primarily by pervasive poverty and high unemployment. These difficulties are compounded by an absence of social infrastructure, weak police presence, and insufficient government support for jobless young people. Furthermore, levels of interaction between rural residents and formal police services remain low. Strengthening partnerships between local communities and the police offers a vital pathway to improving crime prevention and control across rural Nigeria.

Key takeaways

  • Theft is the most common crime reported across rural Nigerian communities.
  • Youths make up the majority of criminal suspects detained at police stations.
  • Poverty and high unemployment among young people are primary drivers of rural criminality.
  • Poor road and communication infrastructure severely hinders effective police crime detection and prevention.
  • Interaction between local communities and the formal police force remains low despite community policing initiatives.

Why it matters

Rural communities frequently lack formal security resources, leaving residents vulnerable to crime. Understanding the root causes of rural offences, such as youth unemployment and inadequate infrastructure, helps policymakers and law enforcement develop more effective security frameworks. Enhancing collaboration between communities and police forces can strengthen local protection and foster safer rural environments.

Commercialisation angle

The abstract does not indicate an application pathway or a direct commercialisation angle.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

The rural areas in Nigeria have become notorious with all kinds of crime. Inadequate amenities such as good roads and communication infrastructure in rural areas in Nigeria have made it difficult for the Nigeria Police to effectively detect and prevent crimes in rural Nigeria. It is consequent on these escalations of criminal activities that rural communities in Nigeria have evolved community policing to protect their neighbourhoods. This article presents the benefits of using qualitative and quantitative methods of data collection to unravel the potentials inherent in informal crime prevention and control in rural localities in Nigeria. The social capital theory was used to bring out the benefits of community participation in crime control in rural Nigeria. Findings from the study indicated high theft cases as common crime in rural Nigeria. Youths were observed to constitute greater percentage of suspects at police stations for crime. Unemployment and poverty among the rural populace especially youths were responsible for these criminalities. The absence of social infrastructure, inadequate police presence and government support to unemployed youths made the crime situations worse in rural areas. There was low level of community interactions with the police in crime prevention and control in rural Nigeria. The study recommended increased police-public partnership in crime prevention and control in rural Nigeria.

Research topics

  • Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Crime, Deviance, and Social Control

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05015

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.