MARATTO

article · PLoS ONE

Community health systems and priority setting for elderly healthcare services in rural Tanzania: Experience from Nzega and Igunga districts

In plain language

Health sector reforms in Tanzania have sought to engage local communities in priority setting to allocate resources efficiently according to citizen demands. An exploratory study conducted across Nzega and Igunga districts investigated the role of community health systems in shaping healthcare services for the elderly. Using twenty-four key informant interviews with health committee representatives, welfare officers, district medical officers, and planners, the research assessed local involvement. The findings show that community health systems strengthen participation in identifying vulnerable older adults and supporting their access to facilities. However, mixed perceptions exist, along with poor awareness among community and family members who often view elderly healthcare solely as a government responsibility. Enhancing collaboration with community health workers and raising local awareness through village meetings, health facilities, and dedicated events are recommended to improve service delivery.

Key takeaways

  • Community health systems strengthen local participation in identifying older individuals in need of healthcare services.
  • Community members play an active role in helping elderly citizens reach health facilities and participating in health facility governing committees.
  • There are mixed perceptions and poor awareness among families and communities, with many assuming elderly healthcare is solely the responsibility of the government.
  • Local government authorities need to fully involve community health workers and other local actors to address elderly healthcare needs in rural areas.

Why it matters

As rural populations age, delivering adequate care requires limited public resources to be used effectively. Understanding how rural communities identify and advocate for vulnerable older residents allows public health planners to design better local decision-making structures. Addressing gaps in community awareness can also encourage shared responsibility between families, local actors, and health authorities.

Commercialisation angle

The abstract does not indicate a commercialisation pathway, as it focuses on public health policy, community governance, and district-level healthcare administration.

AI-generated from the published abstract. Always read the original work before citing.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In the 1990s, Tanzania adopted health sector reforms with the aim of engaging the local communities in priority setting and decision-making for effective and efficient use of resources. Community engagement aims to enhance community voice and efficiently allocate available resources according to the citizen's demands to achieve the targeted health outcomes. The Community Health Systems (CHS) aim to strengthen Primary Health Care (PHC) services by empowering all community actors close to and serving community members. This study explored the role of the CHS during priority setting process in improving health services for the elderly in rural Tanzania. METHODS: An exploratory case study design was employed to collect data using Key Informants Interviews (KIIs) in Nzega and Igunga districts. Purposeful sampling was used to select participants from the two districts. Twenty-four (12 from each district) interviews were conducted with community representative members of the Health Facility Governing Committee (HFGC), social welfare, Council Health Management Team (CHMT), District medical officers, Medical Officers in-charge (MOI), planning officers and health system information focal person. All audio recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim. The transcribed interviews were translated from Kiswahili to English. The data were analyzed using the content analysis approach. The transcribed data, field notes, and documents were reviewed and read to identify broad areas in which to form initial codes and codes. Similar codes with related concepts were grouped to form initial categories and categories. RESULTS: The findings of this study demonstrated the importance of CHS in strengthening community participation in identifying the elderly who are in need in the community and been involved in elderly matters during priority setting of the elderly health services through the health facility governing committee. This means that there was community participation in elderly matters especially to help the elderly reach health facilities and during priority setting, positive and negative perceptions among community members about the elderly agenda during priority setting. In addition, the findings show that there is poor awareness among community members including family members who perceive that the government is responsible for providing health services to the elderly and not the community or family members. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study indicate the importance of community during the priority setting process which plays a great role in identifying the elderly who are in need and the most needed health services for the elderly in their communities. Therefore, the Local government authority should fully involve CHWs in collaboration with all community actors to address elderly matters in rural areas and improve elderly healthcare services. The community members have to be educated and raise awareness about elderly health matters through different platforms such as during world elderly day, village meetings and at the health facility level.

Research topics

  • Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321482

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.