article · Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning
Writing centres in higher education were historically established as remedial support structures for students perceived to have writing deficiencies. Positioned within academic development units or language departments, they were often regarded as add-on services rather than integrated institutional structures. Recent scholarship, however, highlights a shift towards viewing writing centres as collaborative partners in disciplinary writing instruction. Guided by Social Realist Theory, this study explores the enabling and constraining mechanisms affecting the integration of writing centres within universities. A qualitative design using focus group discussions with students, lecturers, and management was employed to gain an in-depth understanding of the research problem. The findings reveal that despite structural changes, underfunding, staff shortages, inadequate resources, and limited infrastructure continue to hinder the institutional integration of writing centres. The study recommends stronger structural and cultural support, alongside increased collaboration with academic departments, to enable stakeholder agency and facilitate the sustainable integration of writing centres within universities.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.17159/cristal.v14i1.27625
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.