article · Automation
Human–robot collaboration (HRC) offers a significant potential to improve productivity, safety, and performance in construction, yet its adoption remains constrained by interrelated barriers. The existing studies largely identify these barriers in isolation, with limited insight into their systemic interactions. This study addresses this gap by synthesising prior research using PRISMA and applying interpretive structural modelling (ISM) to examine the hierarchical and causal relationships among barriers to HRC in construction. Eight barrier categories are identified: financial, safety, communication, robot technology-related, organisational, legal/regulatory, education/training, and social and human factors. The ISM–MICMAC results reveal regulatory and communication barriers as key upstream drivers shaping downstream safety, training, organisational, and technological outcomes. By moving beyond descriptive listings, the study provides a systems-level framework that supports the strategic prioritisation of interventions and informed decision-making. The findings advance the theoretical understanding of HRC as a socio-technical system and offer an evidence-informed foundation for context-sensitive implementation strategies in construction.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.3390/automation7010028
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.