MARATTO

article · The Journal of Vascular Access

Clinical approaches to removing long-term stuck pediatric ports

Abstract

Background: In pediatric oncology, totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADs), or ports, are frequently used for long-term intravenous therapy. While insertion-related complications are well documented, difficulties during removal are rare but clinically significant. Methods: A retrospective review involved 851 pediatric patients underwent port removals between July 2012 and July 2024. Patient demographics, insertion site, catheter dwell time, and removal techniques were analyzed, with a focus on catheter removal-related complications. Results: Removal was uncomplicated among 830 patients (97.5%). However, 21 patients (2.5%) experienced complications due to catheter adherence or migration. These cases required additional interventions, including extensive dissection ( n = 10), controlled venotomy ( n = 5), interventional radiology ( n = 5), and guidewire-assisted stenting ( n = 1). The mean catheter dwell time of the port devices in this cohort prior to removal was 39.35 months. Two patients experienced migrated fragments, which were successfully removed. One patient experienced bleeding during venotomy, which was successfully treated. Conclusion: Long-term central venous catheters removal is often complicated by peri catheter adhesions and calcification. Owing to the risk of significant complications, removal should be performed only when clinically indicated and preferably in specialized centers with access to interventional radiology and cardiac surgery. Comprehensive informed consent is a critical prerequisite for this procedure. This study offers practical guidance for clinicians and an open avenue for future research on preventative strategies and optimized removal protocols.

Research topics

  • Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
  • Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
  • Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1177/11297298251413633

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.