MARATTO

article · Mining Metallurgy & Exploration

Citric Acid Leaching Performance at High Solid-to-Liquid Ratios for Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling

20249 citationsOpen accessStellenbosch University

Abstract

Abstract This study investigated the performance of citric acid as lixiviant for cathode material from end-of-life lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). Black mass containing 84.2 wt% MNC (LiNi 0.45 Mn 0.4 Co 0.15 O 2 ) and 15.8 wt% LCO (LiCoO 2 ) material was leached at solid-to-liquid ratios of 20, 50, and 100 g/L. Leaching with 1.5 M citric acid, 2 vol.% H 2 O 2 , and a solid-to-liquid ratio of 20 g/L at 95 °C extracted 90% Co, 95% Li, 94% Mn, and 94% Ni within 20 min. At the highest solid/liquid ratio of 100 g/L with 1.5 M citric acid, 10 vol.% H 2 O 2 , and 95 °C, 84% Al, 84% Co, 87% Li, 86% Mn, and 96% Ni were leached after 40 min, producing a leach solution containing 0.68 g/L Al, 20.0 g/L Co, 6.0 g/L Li, 13.6 g/L Mn, and 19.3 g/L Ni. Using stepwise addition of H 2 O 2 , instead of initial bulk addition, did not significantly improve the leaching efficiency but did reduce the required leaching time. Temperature control of the reactor was also more manageable with stepwise addition of H 2 O 2 and evolution of gas was less vigorous. It was observed that the leaching efficiencies of Co, Li, and Mn decreased slightly at solid/liquid ratios of 50 g/L and 100 g/L, while the leaching of Ni increased slightly. The solution leached at 20 g/L could be stored for 6 weeks without any spontaneous precipitation. However, solutions leached at 50 g/L and 100 g/L showed changes in concentration after 1 month’s storage, suggesting that processes that have a large material throughput and use high solid-to-liquid ratios around 100 g/L must ensure that the solutions are not stored for extended periods of time.

Research topics

  • Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Advancements in Battery Materials

Read the original research

This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.

DOI: 10.1007/s42461-024-01142-8

Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.

Discussion

Discuss this research

Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.

No discussion yet. Open the first thread.