article · Neuro-Oncology
Abstract AIMS To determine presentation, prediagnostic symptomatic interval (PSI), outcomes and quality of life at 12-week follow-up in children aged 1-17 years diagnosed with CNS tumours at Korle Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH). METHODS This was a hospital-based cross-sectional, correlational study using the PedsQL questionnaire at the initial pre- sentation and 12 weeks after. The study population included all children (aged 1 to 17 years) with a new, ra- diologically diagnosed CNS tumour. and their caregivers attending the Paediatric Oncology and Neurosurgery Units of KBTH. RESULTS The study included 45 children with a median age of 7 years (range 2-17 years) and 56% were males. The most common tumour location was infratentorial (45%) and low-grade gliomas were the most frequent histology (n=23). Common symptoms were headache (n=33), motor abnormalities (n=29) and vomiting (n=24). Two children had Neurofibromatosis type 1. The median diagnostic interval was 121 days (range 44-305 days), with a patient interval of 60 days and a pri- mary healthcare interval of 21 days. Nineteen children (42%) received definitive surgical treatment, with only four children (9%) receiving gross total resection, with a median time to resection of 28.5 days (range 27.5-37 days). Twelve-week survival was 68.9%. There was a strong correlation between caregivers’ and children’s total QOL scores at presentation (r=0.88). At follow-up, children’s self-reports of emotional well-being were lower than caregivers’ assessments. CONCLUSION We have a high rate of mortality at 12 weeks and this needs to be addressed. Children with low-grade tumours experienced longer prediagnostic symptomatic intervals compared to those with high-grade tumours. There was a significant improvement in QOL at 12 weeks, but caregivers underestimated the emotional challenges their children faced. The study emphasizes the need for increased focus on the emotional well-being of children with CNS tumours and their survival.
This page summarises published work. The authoritative version sits with the publisher.
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaf185.085
Is something wrong with this record? Report it or request removal.
Discussion
Have you built on this work, tried to replicate it, or seen it applied in practice? Share what you know. Verified researchers and MARATTO™ domain experts can open a discussion, and any member can reply. Contributions are reviewed before they appear.
No discussion yet. Open the first thread.
New to MARATTO™? Create a free account.